[ dingoinnocent ] - THE AZARIA CHAMBERLAIN MYSTERY
You are not logged in
List   Post     Login   Register       Download forum   Forums  

Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Steve Banic on 2002-26-11 21:11
I have studied the case for many years now and have extensive documentary material. If anyone is game to debate the case, then I am all ears.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck on 2002-28-11 17:59
Steve, do you have any comment on Dingo innocent?? Even if you haven't read the book there's enough on the website to get the debate going. So let's hear what you've got to say.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Steve Banic on 2002-09-12 14:51
To Buck: 1) I have read all the available known literature on the case, including some that are not well known. 2) After reading through the official transcripts (16,000 pages), I firmly believe that Mrs Chamberlain is innocent and that the case is a classic miscarriage of justice. 3) There is a lot of material that suggests that police were not objective during the investigation. 4) I have come across important information that demonstrates that one police officer, now deceased, could have knowingly committed perjury. 5) At the end of the day, the evidence against the Chamberlains was overwhelmingly circumstantial and there were too many "ifs" and "buts" to warrant a conviction for murder.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck on 2002-16-12 01:29
Steve: Does your statement that you have read all include Dingo innocent? Morling had no evidence to support the submission by the Chamberlains that the police were biassed. I agree with you that Lindy was innocent of the charge of murder. The fact that evidence is circumstantial does not belittle it however. Indeed it is harder to gain a conviction with only circumstantial evidence. The key factor in this case was the restriction to an either/or explanation of Lindy or the dingo when neither is tenable on the evidence. What do you have to say about the dingo given you have read all the transcripts? Was there something I missed? We can only improve the legal system if we understand what really went wrong. It's not good enough to claim it was a 'classic' miscarriage of justice. Dingo innocent tries to nail the specific mistakes so that they don't happen again.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Andrew on 2002-24-12 00:47
Can anybody tell me the exact time Azaria disappeared. I am a professional Vedic astrologer and I am writing a story on this. This is a classic case of what the ancient Indian astrologers termed "balarishta" where a new born child is fated to die just after birth. Her natal chart is quite amazing in showing this.

Andrew


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Nikki on 2004-30-04 02:57
I belive that that the monther is guilty, because tell me this how can the dingo fold up the babys clothes?????????????????


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by steve on 2004-02-05 09:24
You will remember (not that you seem to know anything!) that long before the matinee jacket was found, two men found the jacket and one said 'I'll put it back the way I found it...' but of course he folded the thing.
Nikki wrote:
> I belive that that the monther is guilty, because tell me this how can the dingo fold up the babys clothes?????????????????


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Jenn on 2004-16-07 13:26
Many times have i seen the film and still came up with the same conclusion, that the mother was inocent and now with these claims that Mr Cole has come to light with and passed a lie detector test to collabrate that he is in fact telling the truth, now all's they need to do is find Azaria's body and let this poor child rest and give her family peace at last they've suffered enough, who ever thinks that she is guilty needs to re-think. Now with the Jaket and clothes what you have to remember is that the 4 men that night who were too much of cowards to take Azaria back to the arms of her mother so obviously can't be human, Mr Cole was the one who bruried the clothes and has atmitted to it!.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by John on 2004-31-08 21:38
remember lie detectors are not perfect and where the fick is the body


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 07:46
Exactly1


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 07:44
You must read the documentary evidence as provided by the courts and the evidence at hand...there was, indeed human intervention at the scene of finding the baby's clothes. Lindy Chamberlain and her husband, had absolutely nothing to do with the disappearence or death of their child.

The baby's body has never been found, and will never be found. Poor child was a baby. However, there was human intervention at the scene of finding the child's clothes. An animal could not have laid the clothes out as such. And this evidence has already been proven.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Antony Coorey on 2004-17-06 06:33
i have studied and studied this for years and i think that the dingo is innocent and i think that the the parents of the young child committed the murder.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Tye on 2004-19-06 06:55
Do you base your opinion on the actual facts & evidence of the case or your own personal feelings towards Lindy Chamberlain???


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 08:23
I say, read and read some more


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Nikki on 2004-30-04 03:01
Ok then lets go. Do you belive that the mother in in inocent???? Do you belive that the dingo can fold up the clothes and place them under a rock????????? A dingo is an autralian icon mate- adn yous are all giving it SHIT publisity!!!!!!!! Any1 game to battle me???


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Cat on 2004-16-08 02:47
Does a dingo use scissors?... Does an old man have the right to change thee story... 20 yrs after the fact!, Yes, its all coming to light now... 4 men shooting dingoes...<highly illegal practice < Shot a dingo they thought was carrying a rabbit in its mouth .. On cutting it out of the dingoes jaws.. (hence the scissor marks) they found it to be a lil baby girl ... As , some of these men were criminals and didnt want to git into trouble with the law.. They swore not to tell anyone of this story... So they just folded the clothes and got out of there........................
Apparently Azaria's body lays in a backard of one of these men in Melbourne.One of the men has now come to light with this story.. Now that the other 3 have died...So Stop defending the gawd dayum dingoes... THEY ARE FERRIL ANIMALS>>> Who cant be trusted.... U asked about someone battling you .. If youre so sure that dingoes dont attack and kill babies... why dont u try camping with your own children ... @ ayers rock one .. day .. Im sure ... YOU wont be soooooooo ready for battle .. And im sure ud keep an extra close eye on your children !!...
Stoopid FOOL ...


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-17-08 22:30
wow... we have already established what Nikki has said and have passed it. Youv'e come into the story a bit late now... thanks for the input though


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-24-08 06:30
sorry i mean cat i think...


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 08:20
It's not about defending dingoes, it never has been. Get your facts straight.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by K80B on 2004-26-11 02:45
I believe that Lindy is innocent. I was wondering though, why werent these men questioned at the time? I know they were shooting illegally, so perhaps they didnt stay at the camping ground, in which case there would be no evidence of them being there, but if they were camping, surely they would have been questioned.
Anybody who has children would know that Lindy did not kill her baby. I know that people in the past have committed murder on their children, but I have not yet come accross a case that the mother has only killed one of her children. ( that is not to say it has never happend) But usually they kill all of their children due to depression and other mental illnesses.
Cat wrote:
> Does a dingo use scissors?... Does an old man have the right to change thee story... 20 yrs after the fact!, Yes, its all coming to light now... 4 men shooting dingoes...<highly illegal practice < Shot a dingo they thought was carrying a rabbit in its mouth .. On cutting it out of the dingoes jaws.. (hence the scissor marks) they found it to be a lil baby girl ... As , some of these men were criminals and didnt want to git into trouble with the law.. They swore not to tell anyone of this story... So they just folded the clothes and got out of there........................

> Apparently Azaria's body lays in a backard of one of these men in Melbourne.One of the men has now come to light with this story.. Now that the other 3 have died...So Stop defending the gawd dayum dingoes... THEY ARE FERRIL ANIMALS>>> Who cant be trusted.... U asked about someone battling you .. If youre so sure that dingoes dont attack and kill babies... why dont u try camping with your own children ... @ ayers rock one .. day .. Im sure ... YOU wont be soooooooo ready for battle .. And im sure ud keep an extra close eye on your children !!...

> Stoopid FOOL ...


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by dan on 2006-11-05 09:24
i believe mrs chamberlain is not guilty the poor mother gets accused for her own new born babys loss and goes to jail.... the poor lady desserves a appolagize and to be set free


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 08:22
What is your point, coz I'm missing it?


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by anne on 2005-21-01 04:47
Nikki, you really do love the question mark, don't you?????????
The evidence of the clothes has already been dealt with by the person who first discovered them. So change the record and try something else. The first inquest , conducted by a most reliable
lawyer concluded that the baby was initially taken by a dingo and then there was human intervention dealing with the body. This would exactly fit in with Mr.Cole's story which I beleive is true.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck Richardson on 2005-24-01 19:16
Anne: Frank Coles story does not fit all the evidence. The NT Coroner has
dismissed it as has Lindy Chamberlain herself (100% sure it is not true). To get to
the bottom of this case one must address the evidence which is the basis of our
justice system and truth. Please read my post 'Forum Purpose'.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-31-05 22:45
Listen, the reason it's known as the Azaria Chamberlain Mystery is because that's what it is, a mystery. The media hype over the incident made it nearly impossible to determin the truth. Now people may have their own theories on what happened but others will always have their own opinion. There will always be contradiction.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Tye on 2004-09-06 05:49
I have studied the case a well and it is no longer a "mystery" as far im concerned.It's clearly been proven that Azaria Chamberlain died at the hand of nature not the hand of her mother.This is something the Goverment of the NT & the majority of people can't accept so therefore it has never been "officially" been proven.
People should have learned from this tragedy but unfortunatley the majority of Australians haven't they would prefer to carry on with the ignorance and bigortry that looks like will linger forever unfortunatley.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Bobby on 2004-17-06 20:32
Look you all want to blame either the mother or the dingo did you ever think they worked together the mum might have hired the dingo to take out the baby or they had a mutual agreement that they would feed it if it killed the baby


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-21-06 02:14
You are an idiot Bobby but a funny one at that. lol.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by carol on 2004-04-07 21:21
The new revelations might explain the "folded clothes". I"ve always believed that
Lindy didn't do it. Just read the witnesses' accounts, they support Lindy's story.
Look at the timeline in which she is supposed to have killed Azaria, looked after
another child, changed and gone back to the campfire.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-13-07 22:49
I also had a hunch that Liny was innocent, most of which was supported with the space of time she was in the car. But now some more questions have been raised from these new ‘revelations’ such as why didn’t they come forward before now, and why didn’t they hand the child over to the authorities. Keep in mind that there is still a possibility that they’re lying.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by roe on 2004-03-08 22:38
the chamberlains are full of shit. no sound religious faith no moral convictions no enduation and bloody kiwis. no one can trust a kiwi - they have no conscience.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Cat on 2004-25-08 19:38
HA... nice side plot..lmao !!


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Cat on 2004-25-08 19:59
hmmmmm.... You sound as if your making all of us Aussies out to be racist bigots... which is the biggest load of crapola , Ive ever heard.
The truth is Australia is the most welcoming multi cultural nation anywhere...
Melbourne... being the 2nd most highly populated greek population in the world, after Athens.

Who cares about the Chamberlains , christianity, or there bizarre practices... This was a YOUNG family just taking there kids on a holiday when tragedy struck..
As an Australian , I am ashamed of the history of this case. I remember at primary school we use to have a poll running on if lindy was a fake or not...
But .. Australia has changed .. weve grown UP .. and I will not accept this SLANDER ....

Tye writes..."People should have learned from this tragedy but unfortunatley the majority of Australians haven't they would prefer to carry on with the ignorance and bigortry that looks like will linger forever unfortunatley".

U say its all been clearly proven.............. I dont think so... Not until we find lil Azaria's body... It may never happen.. This mystery may never be clearly determined . But, Please dont say the majority of Aussies are BIGOTS .. coz that just aint true...
Mebbe... You should apologize to the MAJORITY for implying were all RACIST and IGNORANT...!!!


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-26-08 04:11
Personally I think you have lost your head. I'm an Australian and I don't think we are 'bigots'. I believe you have your facts mixed up and that there is no point to your arguement.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Cat on 2004-28-08 03:18
James... U old man of 15 .. or have u just turned 16 .. who wasnt alive to even know the bloody story .. I wasnt replying to you .. I was replying to the person that called us aussie BIGOTS... I dont need your personal insults .. Ok? ...Cheers....
Mebbe before u attack someone .. read wtf i was replying back to , and maybe ULL see where you got mixed up .. wanker


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-29-08 19:03
Yeh your probably right I did get mixed up and it is nice to know that you weren't replying to me but... wtf whats this all about greek culture wtf does this have to do with Azaria you are turning this into a ordinary chat room.

How old are you, you sound quite young and I believe any adult who has enough time to make this load of bs up like you have is a fool.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-26-08 04:11
Personally I think you have lost your head. I'm an Australian and I don't think we are 'bigots'. I believe you have your facts mixed up and that there is no point to your arguement.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 08:17
If it was a mystery, there would never have been a murder trial. Unfortunately, for the Chamberlain's that has been long gone...their fate divided. It has been, and will continue to be a travesty of justice case. It is a perfect example of trial by media. So, for any students out there willing to give it a try, please do, because it is a perfect case to examine in this context.

As for me, I was completely awed by it. I lived it, breathed it, examined it, grossed out by it, felt complete remorse by it. Everything that you could think of ... I felt it. Always, maintaining in the Chamberlain's innocence. I will always maintain this stance.

I love animals, am a huge animal lover...and the fact that authorities of NT killed or suppoosedly killed many dingoes in the area, ....flawed me. It seemed inconceivable, for an animal in the wild, it's natural instinct is to kill its prey. Do they know that a baby , a human baby is not its prey? Do they know what is and isn't a predator, always on the look out, watcing, careful paranoia


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Robyn Croft on 2004-23-07 23:45
I've recently started studying the Azaria Chamberlain case and realise that I have little information on the subject. I was wondering if someone could tell me the name(s) of some unbiased web sites or books that have information on the case.
So far my opinion is quite undecided and I would not completely rule out Lindy Chamberlain or the dingoe but I do believe that this bloke from Victoria is full of shit and is only trying to scrape in a few dollars and get his name in the news (as he has exceptionally succeeded at). Thanks.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-25-07 17:53
Robyn Croft,

I myself am only 15 but have for some reason taken an interest in this subject when I wrote a report on it 3 months ago. If you want some unbiased books don't read "Beyond Azaria" (It's written by Michael Chamberlain) though a good website is...
http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/chamberlain1/1.html

this gives an account of what happend.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by roe on 2004-03-08 22:37
get out of here and grow up.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 08:06
Hopefully, this site is not about bigotry or hate or undermining other's opinion...as, all opinion is worthy of notation. However, it must contain some sense of sight, some sense of lateral thinking. If you look very closely at some of the assumed 'facts' contained within the case, you will see the flaws...the unexplained evidence, beyond human reasoning. This case is a brilliant exercise in thinking beyond the facts and reasoning. It requires some sense of compassion and thinking that what is, is exactly that.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by keeley on 2006-03-04 07:19
i think lindy can and can't be the murderer,but you can't tell of course,because there was inconclusive evidence,which means there wasn't enough evidence.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Aimee on 2004-09-09 21:11
i have just studied the whole Azaria case for an assignment. I have always believed Lindy Chamberlain to be guilty of something. At first I thought Frank Cole Was not right. Now having studied the actual evidence and considering what Cole said happened that night I am 100% convinced beyond all doubt Azaria was taken by a dingo the dingo was shot and Azarias body disposed of by Frank Cole and his buddies. They did this because a. they didnt want to be caught doing something they should not have been doing and b. they felt it best that the body not be found because of the trauma suffered.
This case should now be closed. We may not owe Aboriginal Australians a Sorry (as non of us were here) but Australia does without any doubt owe the Chamberlains a huge sorry. And I would be the first person willing to say it.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Tegan on 2004-16-11 19:31
How can you say we can close this case?? How do you know frank cole is telling the truth?? How do you know the dingo did or didnt kill Azaria, and how do u know if Lindy or Micheal killed her??? YOU HAVE NO PROOF........ this case will be closed when we have 100% proof of what happened to Azaria that night and when we find her body............... By the Way Im replying to Amiee.....


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 07:56
Finding Azaria's body is simply out of the question...25 years on, Azaria was just a baby!


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 07:59
Thankfully, someone has seen the light! No, the Chamberlains were not involved in the disappearance of their child. Yes, tehre was human interference with evidence of the bay's clothing, but when the child disappeared it was that of a dingo or animal unknown who took their child. It remains not a mystery, but a complete fact.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by roe on 2004-03-08 22:35
studied the case my butt. whats yr degree? whats yr expertise? what you have done is read media reports and 'followed' them not carried out a detailed investigative analysis since you are in no way equipped to discuss or debate any case letalone Chamberlains. Firstly you were not present. You have no ACTUAL knowledge. Her case has been and is a coverup. Now the Chamberlains have dug up some old has-been who has agreed to be the latest player. Whats he got to lose? Not a thing. He is obviously retarded but money hungry and without a slice of conscience. Just look into his eyes.
As for you - get a life of yr own dickhead.


Subject   THE DINGO DID IT ;)
Posted by roe on 2004-03-08 22:40
;)))


Subject   Re: Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by James on 2004-04-08 01:13
Firstly have done more than "listen to the media". I have been to Ularu had a look at the facts did not see the original camping ground, but reenacted what happened, read the court findings. Secondly the newest "player" has a lot to lose, 1 being his freedom, 2 being his respect with the public and as for degrees i am 15 so i have none but i'd like to hear about yours ... "just look into his eyes" (wjhat a bullshit way to judge a person, you don't know him what right do you have to judge him.


Subject   Re: Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Kim on 2004-17-10 06:55
Hi could some one please clear something up for me? When Frank Cole said he shot the dingo and took Azaria's body, what happened to the dingos body, i have not been able to find any info on it, also there would have been blood, why didnt the trackers find any trace of it? Before anyone has a go at me I think that Lindy is innocent, but would like to know the answers to these questions,


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by anon on 2004-22-11 03:02
i have only just started getting reading material on the lindi chamberlain events and i must say that i don't really know what to believe. i have lived in rural australia my whole life and we constantly have dingoes hanging around and we have never seen anyone attacked by one. but then when you hear about the dingo attacks on fraser island it just makes it more difficult to decide on who is the innocent party so to speak. maybe it would be easier to understand if the evidence had been handled properly in the first place.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Jo on 2004-22-11 22:36
As a three Unit History Student currently analysing the history of this case i would appreciate muchly any information as well as personal opinions on how this case has been handled. As part of my study i wish to research any common perceptions of the case. Quite obviously most people assume either the mother or the dingo were responsible for the death of Baby Azaria, however i would like to hear of anyone with a differing opinion.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck Richardson on 2004-23-11 04:49
Jo - If you are genuinely interested please read About this forum
Buck


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Angeline on 2004-23-11 07:51
The only differing opinion I would like to offer is that, having lived through the case and the events as an adult, I do have some insight as to the 'hype' and the innuendo at the time. This 'hype' continued for many years after the unfortunate incident at the Rock.

My opinion, as has always been, that the Chamberlain's had aboslutely nothing to do with the disappearance of their baby, Azaria. And, unfortunately, it can only be claimed as a disappearance, not necessarily a death.

Although, 25 yrs on, it can only be assumed that baby Azaria is dead or has died at the hands or situation of an animal interfernce. I have always maintained that human intervention disrupted the course of evidence and even that of justice. Human intervention was at hand. BUT, not that of the Chamberlain's.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by jen on 2004-23-11 17:58
has anyone ever thought of the dad, michael, doing a murder? why hasn't he ever been sctutinized? is it cause he was supposededly a pastor!
does anyone else think he may have killed the bub?? why do you think he wasnt interveiwed more closely and investigated deeply at the time??
i just dont get it, and after watching the show last night, (through my eyes, chanel 7) i think michael the father seems abit sus !!!!!!



> Although, 25 yrs on, it can only be assumed that baby Azaria is dead or has died at the hands or situation of an animal interfernce. I have always maintained that human intervention disrupted the course of evidence and even that of justice. Human intervention was at hand. BUT, not that of the Chamberlain's.


Angeline wrote:
> The only differing opinion I would like to offer is that, having lived through the case and the events as an adult, I do have some insight as to the 'hype' and the innuendo at the time. This 'hype' continued for many years after the unfortunate incident at the Rock.

>

> My opinion, as has always been, that the Chamberlain's had aboslutely nothing to do with the disappearance of their baby, Azaria. And, unfortunately, it can only be claimed as a disappearance, not necessarily a death.

>

> Although, 25 yrs on, it can only be assumed that baby Azaria is dead or has died at the hands or situation of an animal interfernce. I have always maintained that human intervention disrupted the course of evidence and even that of justice. Human intervention was at hand. BUT, not that of the Chamberlain's.


Angeline wrote:
> The only differing opinion I would like to offer is that, having lived through the case and the events as an adult, I do have some insight as to the 'hype' and the innuendo at the time. This 'hype' continued for many years after the unfortunate incident at the Rock.

>

> My opinion, as has always been, that the Chamberlain's had aboslutely nothing to do with the disappearance of their baby, Azaria. And, unfortunately, it can only be claimed as a disappearance, not necessarily a death.

>

> Although, 25 yrs on, it can only be assumed that baby Azaria is dead or has died at the hands or situation of an animal interfernce. I have always maintained that human intervention disrupted the course of evidence and even that of justice. Human intervention was at hand. BUT, not that of the Chamberlain's.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by 1234567 on 2005-03-02 22:06
its quite interesting you said that 'jen' howver eye witnesses sate that he was with them the whole time this had occured. unless he kiledthe kid a long time before the panic occured.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Georga on 2004-02-12 21:19
I recon any one who recons she killed her baby sucks you're all so stupid


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by heath on 2004-02-12 21:21
you're a silly bitch


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck Richardson on 2004-03-12 00:50
Heath, Georga's right about Lindy not killing her baby. Please read the post
'Forum Purpose'.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by heath on 2004-02-12 21:21
you're a stupid girl


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by georga on 2004-02-12 21:22
bite me


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by nikita on 2004-03-12 02:57
i think that all the people that think she killed her own baby should BE SHOT IN THE HEAD! and it has happend brfore so i dont know why you are blamming her , yor just a big bunch of DICKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck Richardson on 2004-03-12 18:25
Nikita - Lindy was convicted by a jury containing women in the criminal courts. Her
conviction was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal and in the High Court by
the three most senior legal minds in the country at the time, Chief Justice Gibbs
and Justices Mason and Brennan. Justice Brennan said in his judgement: 'The jury
were neither bound to find, nor to entertain a reasonable doubt about, the
existence of any fact which was inconsistent with the inference of the guilt of Mrs
Chamberlain.'
All the people that think Lindy is/was guilty are not 'dicks'.
Something went terribly wrong in the criminal justice system. Doesn't that require
us to understand what the mistakes were?
Please read my post Forum Purpose.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Buck Richardson on 2004-03-12 00:48
Georga, you're right. Lindy did not kill her baby. Please read the post 'Forum
Purpose'.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by bmc on 2004-09-12 07:03
I would suggest that unless you have had to personally live through the day to day scrutiny of the past 25 years with 50% of the population calling you guilty 35% not sure and 15% believing in you that you keep your opions and comments to yourself.

As far as "Jo", I would suggest checking out www.lindychamberlain.com this site may help in your research efforts.


Subject   Re: The Azaria Chamberlain mystery
Posted by Krystal Jade on 2005-31-03 01:20
can you email me anything to do with the Azaria Chamberlain case. I'm conducting a report and have decieded to write and follow up this case. Any information with be appreciated

Thank you
Krystal



Powered by W-Agora | Hosted by Altnews Forums